Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/redhat-community-ai-tools/harness-eval/standardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/redhat-community-ai-tools/harness-evalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/redhat-community-ai-tools/harness-eval/standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/redhat-community-ai-tools/harness-eval/standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/redhat-community-ai-tools/harness-eval/standards.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Standards
Follow PEP 8 conventions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9101cfe44cf7
standards is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository redhat-community-ai-tools/harness-eval (27 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 33 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
010-python-tooling
Python tooling and dependency conventions for plugin-eval and tools/.
rules
Always reference the python code in the docs e.g. ModelSettings should link to [ModelSettings][pydanticai.settings.ModelSettings].
pyspark-etl-best-practices-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for PySpark ETL development with code style, joins, window functions, map operations, and Iceberg patterns.
python-flask-json-guide-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python Flask development with JSON guide.
python-llm-ml-workflow-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python LLM & ML development with workflow integration.
python-github-setup-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python development with GitHub setup integration.