Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/renangf4/personal-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/renangf4/personal-hub/atualizar-readme)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/renangf4/personal-hub/atualizar-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/renangf4/personal-hub/atualizar-readme/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/renangf4/personal-hub/atualizar-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/renangf4/personal-hub/atualizar-readme.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00238 | $0.00238 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00119 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
atualizar-readme scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 26 lines · 238 tokens per session scan A 99993d8b7b01
atualizar-readme is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository renangf4/personal-hub (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 238 tokens to every session, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
git-conventions
See CONTRIBUTING.md → "PR & commit conventions" for PR title format, commit messages, and branch naming.
python-github-setup-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python development with GitHub setup integration.
commit
Conventional Commits specification and git commit workflow rules.
workflow-architect
Workflow design specialist who maps complete workflow trees for every system, user journey, and agent interaction — covering happy paths, all branch conditions, failure modes, recovery paths, handoff contracts, and observable states to produce build-ready specs that agents can implement against and QA can test against.
commit
Cursor rule "commit" from Pukakiii/Job-Agent, covering commit message, guidelines and body.
commit-sponsors
Every git commit message must acknowledge BetterDesk supporters.