Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00553 | $0.00553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00277 | $0.00277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00111 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00055 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Story Workflow
name: code-review description: "Perform an ADVERSARIAL Senior Developer code review that finds 3-10 specific problems in every story. Challenges everything: code quality, test coverage, architecture compliance, security, performance. NEVER accepts 'looks good' - must find minimum issues and can auto-fix with user approval." author: "BMad"
Critical variables from config
config_source: "{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/config.yaml" output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder" user_name: "{config_source}:user_name" communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language" user_skill_level: "{config_source}:user_skill_level" document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language" date: system-generated sprint_artifacts: "{config_source}:sprint_artifacts" sprint_status: "{sprint_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml || {output_folder}/sprint-status.yaml"
Workflow components
installed_path: "{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review" instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.xml" validation: "{installed_path}/checklist.md" template: false
variables:
Project context
project_context: "**/project-context.md" story_dir: "{sprint_artifacts}"
Smart input file references - handles both whole docs and sharded docs
Priority: Whole document first, then sharded version
Strategy: SELECTIVE LOAD - only load the specific epic needed for this story review
input_file_patterns: architecture: description: "System architecture for review context" whole: "{output_folder}/architecture.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/architecture/.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" ux_design: description: "UX design specification (if UI review)" whole: "{output_folder}/ux.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/ux/.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" epics: description: "Epic containing story being reviewed" whole: "{output_folder}/epic.md" sharded_index: "{output_folder}/epic/index.md" sharded_single: "{output_folder}/epic/epic-{{epic_num}}.md" load_strategy: "SELECTIVE_LOAD" document_project: description: "Brownfield project documentation (optional)" sharded: "{output_folder}/index.md" load_strategy: "INDEX_GUIDED"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 59 lines · 553 tokens per session scan A 8dd53c8e4d1c
code-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP (4 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 553 tokens to every session, about $0.0028 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
sweep-benchmarks
Audit xrspatial modules for asv benchmark coverage gaps: missing benchmarks, backend parameterization gaps, unrepresentative inputs, broken or silently-skipped benchmarks.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.