implementation-readiness

implementation-readiness is a cursor rule for Cursor from rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP. It costs 9 tokens per session (642 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A readiness check for a software project's product requirements, design, architecture, planned work, and user stories before coding starts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review whether planning documents agree and whether the planned work covers the required product scope.
Why use it?
It helps find missing details, conflicting decisions, and gaps in the minimum viable product before implementation begins.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Use it to review whether planning documents agree and whether the planned work covers the required product scope.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for implementation-readiness

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for implementation-readiness

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/implementation-readiness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 9 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 642 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00009 $0.00642
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00321
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00128
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00064

Measured 6d ago against content hash 700b8b94f999, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implementation-readiness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/bmad/bmm/workflows/implementation-readiness.mdc · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implementation Readiness - Workflow Configuration

name: implementation-readiness description: "Validate that PRD, UX Design, Architecture, Epics and Stories are complete and aligned before Phase 4 implementation. Ensures all artifacts cover the MVP requirements with no gaps or contradictions." author: "BMad"

Critical variables from config

config_source: "{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/config.yaml" output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder" user_name: "{config_source}:user_name" communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language" document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language" date: system-generated

Workflow status integration

workflow_status_workflow: "{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/workflow.yaml" workflow_paths_dir: "{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths" workflow_status_file: "{output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml"

Module path and component files

installed_path: "{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/implementation-readiness" template: "{installed_path}/template.md" instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.md" validation: "{installed_path}/checklist.md"

Output configuration

default_output_file: "{output_folder}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md"

Smart input file references - handles both whole docs and sharded docs

Priority: Whole document first, then sharded version

Strategy: How to load sharded documents (FULL_LOAD, SELECTIVE_LOAD, INDEX_GUIDED)

input_file_patterns: prd: description: "Product Requirements with FRs and NFRs" whole: "{output_folder}/prd.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/prd/index.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" epics: description: "Epic breakdown with user stories" whole: "{output_folder}/epic.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/epic/index.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" architecture: description: "System architecture with decisions and patterns" whole: "{output_folder}/architecture.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/architecture/index.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" ux_design: description: "UX design specification (if UI components)" whole: "{output_folder}/ux.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/ux/index.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" tech_spec: description: "Technical specification (for Quick Flow track)" whole: "{output_folder}/tech-spec.md" sharded: "{output_folder}/tech-spec/index.md" load_strategy: "FULL_LOAD" document_project: description: "Brownfield project documentation (optional)" sharded: "{output_folder}/index.md" load_strategy: "INDEX_GUIDED"

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 69 lines · 642 tokens per session scan A 700b8b94f999

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implementation-readiness is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP (4 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 642 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.