Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/shard-doc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/shard-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/shard-doc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/shard-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/shard-doc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.01334 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00667 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
shard-doc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Split large markdown documents into smaller, organized files based on level 2 sections using @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser tool
<step n="2" title="Get Destination Folder">
<action>Determine default destination: same location as source file, folder named after source file without .md extension</action>
<action>Example: /path/to/architecture.md → /path/to/architecture/</action>
<action>Ask user for the destination folder path ([y] to confirm use of default: [suggested-path], else enter a new path)</action>
<action if="user accepts default">Use the suggested destination path</action>
<action if="user provides custom path">Use the custom destination path</action>
<action>Verify destination folder exists or can be created</action>
<action>Check write permissions for destination</action>
<action if="permission denied">HALT with error message</action>
</step>
<step n="3" title="Execute Sharding">
<action>Inform user that sharding is beginning</action>
<action>Execute command: `npx @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser explode [source-document] [destination-folder]`</action>
<action>Capture command output and any errors</action>
<action if="command fails">HALT and display error to user</action>
</step>
<step n="4" title="Verify Output">
<action>Check that destination folder contains sharded files</action>
<action>Verify index.md was created in destination folder</action>
<action>Count the number of files created</action>
<action if="no files created">HALT with error message</action>
</step>
<step n="5" title="Report Completion">
<action>Display completion report to user including:</action>
<i>- Source document path and name</i>
<i>- Destination folder path</i>
<i>- Number of section files created</i>
<i>- Confirmation that index.md was created</i>
<i>- Any tool output or warnings</i>
<action>Inform user that sharding completed successfully</action>
</step>
<step n="6" title="Handle Original Document">
<critical>Keeping both the original and sharded versions defeats the purpose of sharding and can cause confusion</critical>
<action>Present user with options for the original document:</action>
<ask>What would you like to do with the original document `[source-document-name]`?
Options: [d] Delete - Remove the original (recommended - shards can always be recombined) [m] Move to archive - Move original to a backup/archive location [k] Keep - Leave original in place (NOT recommended - defeats sharding purpose)
Your choice (d/m/k):
<check if="user selects 'd' (delete)">
<action>Delete the original source document file</action>
<action>Confirm deletion to user: "✓ Original document deleted: [source-document-path]"</action>
<note>The document can be reconstructed from shards by concatenating all section files in order</note>
</check>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 116 lines · 1,334 tokens per session scan A 2be75a3de0de
shard-doc is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP (4 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 1,334 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
shard-doc
BMAD CORE Tool: Shard Document.
citazioni
Citazioni corrette (stile numerico) e bibliografia coerente per tesi triennale in LaTeX.
sigma-reports
Build, validate, retrieve, and safely update Sigma report code representations through /v2/reports/spec. Use for fixed-layout or pixel-perfect reports, invoices, statements, regulatory documents, and PDF delivery. Covers report pages, absolute pixel layout, header/footer panels, common elements, verification…
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.