Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-plugin/release-process)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-plugin/release-process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-plugin/release-process/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-plugin/release-process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-plugin/release-process.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00522 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
release-process scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Release Process
Follow these steps to properly release a new version of the MCP plugin for Obsidian submission:
Pre-Release Checklist
- Ensure all tests pass:
npm run check - Ensure all changes have been committed to the repository
- Review the non-test diff since the last release
- Update CHANGELOG.md with the new version:
## [x.y.z] - YYYY-MM-DD - feat: New feature description - fix: Bug fix description - refactor: Other changes
Version Bump
- Update the version number in the package.json
- Run the version bump script to update version references
npm run versionThis script:- Updates the version in manifest.json
- Updates versions.json with the new version
- Run a final check:
npm run check - Commit all the changes
git commit -a -m 'release: prepare x.y.z release'
Tag and Push
git tag x.y.z
git push origin x.y.z
GitHub Release
After pushing the tag, GitHub Actions will:
- Create a draft release with notes from the CHANGELOG
- Build the plugin
- Upload the required files as binary attachments to the release:
- main.js
- manifest.json
- styles.css (if used by the plugin)
IMPORTANT: Obsidian Plugin Requirements
For Obsidian plugin directory submission, the release MUST have:
- The tag version (x.y.z) MUST exactly match the version in manifest.json
- The main.js, manifest.json, and styles.css (if applicable) files MUST be uploaded as binary attachments
- After review, the draft release must be published
Final Steps
- Wait for GitHub workflows to complete:
# Get the run IDs for the latest release gh run list -c $(git rev-parse x.y.z) # Wait for the run to complete gh run watch {CI run id} gh run watch {release run id} - View and publish the release:
gh release view x.y.z --web - After publishing the release, verify that all required files are attached to the release
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A f79e49bc9f5d
release-process is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rygwdn/obsidian-mcp-plugin (11 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 522 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
changesets
Changeset format and bump rules enforced by CI.
release-notes
Generate changelog entries and GitHub releases from git history. Categorizes commits into features, fixes, breaking changes, and docs. Supports conventional commits, PR-based grouping, and semantic versioning. Creates formatted CHANGELOG.md entries and GitHub releases.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
release-checklist
What to update with each code change or version release.
github-cli-guide
A guide on how to use the Github CLI (gh cli) especially related to creating issues via the CLI.
release-policy
Release, versioning, and signing policy for setmac.