Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modules/architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modules/architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modules/architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modules/architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modules/architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01061 | $0.01061 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00424 | $0.00424 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00212 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00106 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architecture Rules — flutter_core_modules
Layer Structure
This package uses strict Clean Architecture with three layers per feature:
domain/ ← pure Dart, no Flutter, no third-party imports
data/ ← implements domain abstractions, may use third-party SDKs
presentation/ ← Flutter + Riverpod only, no direct SDK calls
Dependency Direction (enforced)
presentation→domain(ALLOWED)data→domain(ALLOWED)domain→ nothing outside domain (ENFORCED — no Flutter, no third-party)presentation→dataonly to import Riverpod providers (ALLOWED)data→presentation(FORBIDDEN)domain→data(FORBIDDEN — only through abstract interfaces)
Either<L, R> — Error Handling
All operations that can fail return Future<Either<Failure, T>> or Either<Failure, T>.
// CORRECT — use Either for fallible operations
Future<Either<StorageFailure, String>> getDownloadUrl({...});
// WRONG — never throw exceptions across layer boundaries
Future<String> getDownloadUrl({...}) { throw Exception('...'); }
L(Left) = Failure type (always a sealed class)R(Right) = success value- Use
.fold(onLeft, onRight)to consume Either values - Never use
try-catchin domain layer — only in data layer implementations
Failure Types
Define failures as sealed classes. One sealed class per feature domain:
// CORRECT
sealed class StorageFailure {}
class UnidentifiedStorageFailure extends StorageFailure {}
class EmptyCacheStorageFailure extends StorageFailure {}
// WRONG — never use String, int, or Exception as failure types
State Machine
All async data has exactly four states — use the core State<F, S> sealed class:
sealed class State<F, S> {}
class StartedState<F, S> extends State<F, S> {} // initial
class LoadInProgressState<F, S> extends State<F, S> {} // loading
class LoadSuccessState<F, S> extends State<F, S> {} // success
class LoadFailureState<F, S> extends State<F, S> {} // failure
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 1,061 tokens per session scan A 50d89df80bdc
architecture is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository sampaio-tech/flutter-core-modules (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,061 tokens to every session, about $0.0042 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
Kortix is a React Native + Expo app built with TypeScript, NativeWind (Tailwind CSS), and a custom design system.
nativescript
NativeScript best practices and patterns for mobile applications.
gradle
Enforce modern Gradle build practices for Java and Android projects, focusing on Kotlin DSL, modularity, version catalogs, and performance optimizations.
android-viewmodel
Android ViewModel conventions — StateFlow, repository abstraction, coroutines, no LiveData.
project-structure
Cursor rule "project-structure" from HeeGyeong/ComposeSample, covering project structure guide, layer structure, modularization rules, dependency rules and resource management.
ios-ui-development-focus
UI/UX and SwiftUI best practices - HIG compliance, presentation APIs, layout patterns.