cursorrules

A set of working rules for a Gitee bridge, which connects an agent to Gitee, a Chinese code-hosting website similar to GitHub.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for checking active repositories, inspecting Gitee data, translating Chinese content, and saving a watchlist of projects found during work.
Why use it?
It gives the agent session-specific instructions for using live Gitee data, handling access limits, protecting secrets, and avoiding made-up results.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/sandraschi/gitee-mcp/cursorrules
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sandraschi/gitee-mcp

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 250 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 250 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00250 $0.00250
Opus 5 $0.00125 $0.00125
Sonnet 5 $0.00050 $0.00050
Haiku 4.5 $0.00025 $0.00025

Measured yesterday against content hash 8d51c71cd68e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cursorrules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursorrules · 23 lines

What it actually says

Cursor rules for gitee-mcp

  • Backend: FastMCP 3.4.4+, portmanteau tools, uv run python only
  • Never fake data: anonymous repo search -> auth_required error
  • Radar uses real live commits/stars; Gitee trending is unscrapable
  • just ci before merge; ASCII-only scripts; no em dashes anywhere
  • One .env at repo root; secrets never in code
  • GITEE_TOKEN unlocks the search tier (free token, no CC)

Session Context (Gitee MCP)

Bridge to Gitee (gitee.com), China's largest Chinese-language code hosting platform: live activity radar, repo intel, user/repo search and zh->en translation via your local LLM.

Before starting work:

  1. Check what is humming: gitee_explore(operation="humming", limit=10)
  2. Check status/tier: show_gitee_status_card() or gitee_help()

At end of work, save insights:

  • Offer a watchlist of interesting repos you found (radar + repo commits)
  • Respect the anonymous budget (~60 req/hour) - cache-aware, small limits
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 23 lines · 250 tokens per session scan A 8d51c71cd68e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cursorrules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository sandraschi/gitee-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 250 tokens to every session, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.