awesome-cursor-rules-mdc is a generator that creates Cursor MDC rule files from structured library information, using semantic search and language models to gather and organize guidance. Developers use it to produce reusable rules for libraries in Cursor, and the catalogue includes 200 of those rules.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/aws-dynamodbgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/aws-dynamodb)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/aws-dynamodb"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/aws-dynamodb.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01363 | $0.01363 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00681 | $0.00681 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00273 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00136 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
aws-dynamodb scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aws-dynamodb Best Practices
This guide outlines the definitive best practices for interacting with AWS DynamoDB, ensuring optimal performance, security, and maintainability. We leverage AWS SDK v3, modern data modeling, and infrastructure-as-code principles.
1. Data Modeling: Single-Table Design is King
Embrace single-table design to minimize operational overhead and maximize query flexibility. Only use Global Secondary Indexes (GSIs) when your access patterns cannot be satisfied by the primary key.
✅ GOOD: Single-Table Design with Composite Primary Keys
Model your primary key (Partition Key + Sort Key) to serve your most frequent access patterns. Use generic attribute names like PK and SK to allow for diverse item types within the same table.
// Example: User and Order data in a single table
// PK: USER#<userId>, SK: #METADATA (for user details)
// PK: USER#<userId>, SK: ORDER#<orderId> (for user's orders)
interface UserItem {
PK: string; // e.g., USER#123
SK: string; // e.g., #METADATA
userId: string;
username: string;
email: string;
}
interface OrderItem {
PK: string; // e.g., USER#123
SK: string; // e.g., ORDER#abc-123
orderId: string;
userId: string;
orderDate: string;
totalAmount: number;
}
// Access Pattern: Get User by userId -> Query: PK = 'USER#<userId>', SK = '#METADATA'
// Access Pattern: Get all Orders for a User -> Query: PK = 'USER#<userId>', SK begins_with 'ORDER#'
❌ BAD: Multi-Table Design for Related Entities
Creating separate tables for every entity type (e.g., UsersTable, OrdersTable) leads to increased operational complexity and often requires more complex cross-table queries or application-level joins.
// Don't do this unless absolutely necessary for strict isolation
// UsersTable: PK = userId
// OrdersTable: PK = orderId, GSI on userId
2. Code Organization and Structure
Organize your DynamoDB interactions into dedicated data access layers (DALs) or repositories. Use the AWS SDK v3's modular clients and async/await.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 145 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bcbb573ae1f3
aws-dynamodb is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc (3,571 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 1,363 tokens to every session, about $0.0068 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
as-contract-cast-smell
// ❌ WRONG — bypasses the family ContractSerializer seam const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract; const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract .
no-backward-compatibility
Do not add backward-compatibility shims or migration scaffolding.
query-optimization
查詢優化、EXPLAIN、index 設計與 RLS 效能測量.
ehs-ims-conventions
EHS IMS app — RBAC, data layer, tRPC, migrations, AI boundaries.
sync-timedb-archive-janitor-contract
Day-close / cold-path worker contracts for synctimedb (A invariants; B tick coordinator retired).