Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/savagelysubtle/BIG-BRAIN-Memory-BankWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/130-validation-reporting-system)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/130-validation-reporting-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/130-validation-reporting-system/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/130-validation-reporting-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/130-validation-reporting-system.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03669 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01468 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00734 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00367 |
Grade A, and why
130-validation-reporting-system scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 575 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
description: WHEN verification completes GENERATE comprehensive reports on memory bank health globs: ["/*.md", "/*.mdc"] alwaysApply: true
TL;DR: The Validation Reporting System generates comprehensive reports on Memory Bank health, displaying verification results, identifying issues, and providing actionable insights for maintaining optimal operation.
1.0.0
1. **Initialization Report**
- Comprehensive verification at session start
- Full Memory Bank health assessment
- Critical issues highlighted
- Ready-state confirmation
2. **Operation Report**
- Focused verification during active sessions
- Task-relevant components verified
- Context-specific validation
- Operational impact assessment
3. **Bedtime Report**
- Comprehensive pre-shutdown verification
- Memory persistence validation
- Update confirmation
- Readiness for next session
4. **Recovery Report**
- Post-recovery verification results
- Resolution effectiveness assessment
- Remaining issues identification
- Prevention recommendations
Each report type has specialized formats and content emphasis.
```
## 🛡️ Memory Bank Validation Report
### Summary
- Report type: [Initialization/Operation/Bedtime/Recovery]
- Timestamp: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]
- Overall status: [Optimal/Healthy/Attention Required/Critical]
- Health score: [0-100%]
- Files verified: [Count]
- Issues found: [Count by severity]
### Verification Results
- File Verification: [Pass/Partial/Fail] - [Score]
- Consistency Checks: [Pass/Partial/Fail] - [Score]
- Reference Validation: [Pass/Partial/Fail] - [Score]
- Structural Integrity: [Pass/Partial/Fail] - [Score]
### Issues
#### Critical Issues
- [Issue description]
> Location: [File:Section]
> Impact: [Description of operational impact]
> Resolution: [Recommended action]
#### Warnings
- [Warning description]
> Location: [File:Section]
> Impact: [Description of potential impact]
> Resolution: [Recommended action]
#### Notices
- [Notice description]
> Location: [File:Section]
> Recommendation: [Improvement suggestion]
### Health Metrics
- Completeness: [Percentage]
- Consistency: [Percentage]
- Timeliness: [Percentage]
- Accessibility: [Percentage]
### Recommendations
1. [Primary recommendation]
2. [Secondary recommendation]
3. [Additional recommendation]
### Verification History
- Previous status: [Status from last report]
- Trend: [Improving/Stable/Declining]
- Recent changes: [Significant changes since last report]
```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 575 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7147c7c523e4
130-validation-reporting-system is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository savagelysubtle/BIG-BRAIN-Memory-Bank (5 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,669 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
wrapup
End-of-session wrap-up: summarizes the session and pushes a log to the project's linked NotebookLM notebook. Activate with @wrapup in chat, or "wrap up", "save this session", or "end of session".
search-routing
Smart Search Routing — always use QMD semantic search when available, never bypass with grep for vault content.
web
Web build conventions (separate from native and RN JS).
components
Component patterns and UI conventions.
git
Git workflow and commit conventions.
approved-plan-execution
Guard execution of an approved plan or burndown: forbid reward hacking and feature deletion; require checkpoints, context discipline, safe terminal use, and fresh verification. Applies to approved plan-.md, complete-everything, and burndown-full runs, whatever model runs them.