170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms

170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms is a cursor rule for Cursor from savagelysubtle/BIG-BRAIN-Memory-Bank. It costs 0 tokens per session (3,754 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of rules for enforcing required command, workflow, memory, and verification procedures in projects that use Markdown or MDC files. It defines checks for valid commands, correct process order, required records, and review steps.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when running commands or workflows that must update memory files, follow defined phases, preserve references, document decisions, or pass required validation and approval checks.
Why use it?
It helps prevent skipped steps, invalid commands, missing project records, and incomplete verification. This keeps the project's documented process consistent over time.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Use it when running commands or workflows that must update memory files, follow defined phases, preserve references, document decisions, or pass required validation and approval checks.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/savagelysubtle/BIG-BRAIN-Memory-Bank

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for 170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/savagelysubtle/big-brain-memory-bank/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 3,754 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.03754
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01877
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00751
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00375

Measured 10d ago against content hash 39ee7056eb36, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/BIG_BRAIN/Core/Command/170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms.mdc · 616 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 616 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


description: WHEN executing commands ENFORCE protocol compliance for memory bank operations globs: ["/*.md", "/*.mdc"] alwaysApply: true

TL;DR: The Protocol Enforcement Mechanisms ensure adherence to command protocols, workflow processes, and memory maintenance requirements through systematic validation, enforcement, and correction mechanisms.

1.0.0

1. **Command Protocols**
   - Command structure correctness
   - Parameter validity
   - Option compatibility
   - Command sequence appropriateness
   - Command context alignment

2. **Workflow Protocols**
   - Workflow phase sequence
   - Phase entry/exit conditions
   - Required artifacts
   - Decision documentation
   - Validation checkpoints

3. **Memory Maintenance Protocols**
   - Required file updates
   - Consistency requirements
   - Reference integrity
   - Documentation standards
   - Version control practices

4. **Verification Protocols**
   - Required verification steps
   - Validation criteria
   - Quality standards
   - Review requirements
   - Approval processes

Each protocol type has specific enforcement mechanisms.
1. **Validation Gates**
   - Pre-execution validation of protocol requirements
   - Verification of prerequisites and conditions
   - Confirmation of required context
   - Approval for critical operations

2. **Process Guardrails**
   - Runtime checks during execution
   - Boundary enforcement for operations
   - Progress verification at milestones
   - State integrity protection

3. **Correction Guidance**
   - Specific direction for protocol violations
   - Remediation suggestions
   - Alternative approaches
   - Learning resources

4. **Compliance Documentation**
   - Record of protocol adherence
   - Deviation documentation
   - Exception handling
   - Enforcement actions

These mechanisms ensure protocols are maintained throughout operations.
1. **Structure Validation**
   - Syntax checking against command schema
   - Parameter type validation
   - Option compatibility verification
   - Required parameter confirmation

2. **Context Validation**
   - Workflow state compatibility
   - Prerequisite command verification
   - Resource availability confirmation
   - Command appropriateness for task

3. **Execution Control**
   - Permission verification
   - Resource allocation checking
   - Impact assessment
   - Risk-based execution controls

Read the full file on GitHub · 616 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 616 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 39ee7056eb36

Subscribe to this mod's changes

170-protocol-enforcement-mechanisms is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository savagelysubtle/BIG-BRAIN-Memory-Bank (5 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,754 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.