Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sitecore/content-sdkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/sitecore/content-sdk/repo-structure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sitecore/content-sdk/repo-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sitecore/content-sdk/repo-structure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sitecore/content-sdk/repo-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sitecore/content-sdk/repo-structure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00159 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
repo-structure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Repository structure
Templates: packages/create-content-sdk-app/src/templates/ — copied to generated apps; self-contained; .env.*.example for env values.
Initializers: Initializer.init(args) in packages/create-content-sdk-app/src/initializers/. Reuse src/common/ processes.
Samples: yarn scaffold-samples; inside samples/ use that app's AGENTS.md.
Full layout and package map: .agents/docs/AGENTS-repo-and-packages.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago First seen · 18 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ed843cf74d36
repo-structure is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Sitecore/content-sdk (37 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 159 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).
sprint-planning
BMAD BMM Agent: sprint-planning.