typescript

typescript is a cursor rule for Cursor from solvapay/solvapay-sdk. It costs 371 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of TypeScript rules for safer, more consistent code. It requires strict type checking and recommends patterns such as named exports, inferred schema types, and explicit handling of unknown values.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when creating or reviewing TypeScript packages. It covers compiler settings, types, exports, variables, type narrowing, assertions, schemas, and error suppressions.
Why use it?
It reduces errors caused by missing or overly loose type information. It also makes code easier to refactor and search without hiding problems through unsafe type overrides.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Use it when creating or reviewing TypeScript packages. It covers compiler settings, types, exports, variables, type narrowing, assertions, schemas, and error suppressions.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solvapay/solvapay-sdk

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for typescript

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for typescript

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/solvapay/solvapay-sdk/typescript.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 371 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 371 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00371 $0.00371
Opus 5.5 $0.00148 $0.00148
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00074 $0.00074
Haiku 4.5 $0.00037 $0.00037

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 0ad45efed3f8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

typescript scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/typescript.mdc · 33 lines

What it actually says

TypeScript Standards

Strict Mode

Always use strict: true in tsconfig. No exceptions for new packages.

Never Use any

Zero tolerance -- no any, no as any, no suppressions. Use unknown and narrow the type with type guards, Zod parsing, or instanceof.

Exports and Declarations

  • Prefer named exports -- do not use export default. Named exports improve refactoring, auto-imports, and grep-ability
  • Prefer const over let; never use var -- use let only when reassignment is genuinely needed

Type Assertions and Narrowing

  • Minimize type assertions (as) -- prefer type guards, discriminated unions, or Zod .parse(). If an assertion is unavoidable, add a comment explaining why
  • Avoid non-null assertions (!) -- use optional chaining ?., nullish coalescing ??, or explicit null checks
  • Prefer @ts-expect-error over @ts-ignore -- it errors when the suppression becomes unnecessary. Always include an explanation

Types and Schemas

  • Prefer union types over enum -- use type Status = 'active' | 'inactive' with companion as const array for runtime values
  • Derive types from Zod v4 schemas -- use z.infer<typeof Schema> to derive types. Never duplicate a type definition alongside its Zod schema
  • All public API types must be explicitly annotated and exported
  • Let TypeScript infer where obvious -- don't annotate local variables or simple return types the compiler already knows
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 371 tokens per session scan A 0ad45efed3f8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

typescript is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository solvapay/solvapay-sdk (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 371 tokens to every session, about $0.0015 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.