Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/spencergoldade/cursor-designer/security-ux-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spencergoldade/cursor-designerWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00495 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
security-ux-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 51 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A e01ea1e9af4d
security-ux-patterns is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository spencergoldade/cursor-designer (30 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 495 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
copywriting
Write or rewrite any text a user reads (interface strings, errors, empty states, landing and pricing pages, posts, changelogs, store listings, ads, email): apply when asked to write copy, rewrite a headline or CTA, fix microcopy, or when a draft reads machine-made.
vision
Product vision (docs/ux/vision.md): apply when defining what the product is and what it refuses to become, when a proposed feature feels off-strategy, or when a scope argument has no document that settles it.
brand-voice
Brand voice and copy — docs/brand/ is the source of truth for how the product speaks; any public-facing text change updates it in the same change and passes docs/brand/lint.py.
viteplus
../../AGENTS.md.
super-ux
Cursor rule "super-ux" from ssheleg/super-ux, covering ux scenarios — hard rule (super-ux) and which rule owns which question.
ux-flows
Design or improve user flows (docs/ux/flows.md): apply for task analysis, flow diagrams, screen states, wireframes, heuristic UX evaluation, or any 'improve/fix the UX' request.