Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stackhawk/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/stackhawk/agent-skills/stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/stackhawk/agent-skills/stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/stackhawk/agent-skills/stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/stackhawk/agent-skills/stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/stackhawk/agent-skills/stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
HawkScan high-iteration findings guide: per-finding fix guidance for CSP, CORS, Auth (unprotected endpoint), and Missing Security Headers. Covers why each finding fires, minimal done fix, curl verification command, resca How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
High-Iteration Findings Reference
Findings that commonly cause agents to loop. For each, "done" is defined — use the verify command before rescanning, and escalate at the threshold instead of continuing.
Contents
- Content Security Policy (CSP)
- CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing)
- Authentication / Broken Auth (Unprotected Endpoint)
- Missing Security Headers
Escalation thresholds:
- 2 rescans for complex policy/config findings: CSP, CORS, Auth
- 1 rescan for simple additive fixes: Missing Security Headers
Iteration-limit note: Guard Rails says "max one fix-rescan cycle per task" — that applies to the autonomous loop as a whole. The escalation thresholds below apply within a single fix attempt for a specific finding. After escalating, report the finding rather than restarting the full loop.
Content Security Policy (CSP)
Why it fires: Missing Content-Security-Policy header, or header present but uses
unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval, or wildcard (*) sources.
Minimal done fix:
- HTML-serving routes: Add a CSP header eliminating wildcards and
unsafe-*directives. Starter policy:Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' - JSON/API endpoints that never serve HTML: Mark as false positive — CSP is inapplicable
to non-HTML responses. Use the
hawk op scan triagecommand from Step 5.
Verify before rescanning:
curl -sI <url> | grep -i content-security-policy
If this returns empty, the header isn't being sent — check middleware order and route scope before rescanning. Do not rescan until the header appears here.
Rescan expectation: 0 CSP findings for the fixed paths.
Escalate when: The header appears in curl -sI output but the scanner still fires after
2 rescans. Stop iterating; surface the specific directive the scanner objects to and ask
the user.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A ce8832ad22b2
stackhawk-hawkscan-high-iteration is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository stackhawk/agent-skills (16 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
error-handling-and-validation
A code-quality guide for handling errors, invalid inputs, edge cases, preconditions, logging, and user-friendly error messages.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.
modus-checkbox-value-inversion-react-short
Critical bug fix for ModusWcCheckbox value property inversion.
javascript-expert-performance
Profile first. Measure before and after. Never optimize without data.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
5-bug-finder
APPLY WHEN investigating a bug.