Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/steipete/agent-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/steipete/agent-rules/code-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/steipete/agent-rules/code-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/steipete/agent-rules/code-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/steipete/agent-rules/code-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/steipete/agent-rules/code-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00245 | $0.00245 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00098 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00049 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
code-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- code-analysis — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Code Analysis
Perform advanced code analysis with multiple inspection options.
Analysis Menu:
1. Knowledge Graph Generation
- Map relationships between components
- Visualize dependencies
- Identify architectural patterns
2. Code Quality Evaluation
- Complexity metrics
- Maintainability index
- Technical debt assessment
- Code duplication detection
3. Performance Analysis
- Identify bottlenecks
- Memory usage patterns
- Algorithm complexity
- Database query optimization
4. Security Review
- Vulnerability scanning
- Input validation checks
- Authentication/authorization review
- Sensitive data handling
5. Architecture Review
- Design pattern adherence
- SOLID principles compliance
- Coupling and cohesion analysis
- Module boundaries
6. Test Coverage Analysis
- Coverage percentages
- Untested code paths
- Test quality assessment
- Missing edge cases
Process:
- Select analysis type based on need
- Run appropriate tools and inspections
- Generate comprehensive report
- Provide actionable recommendations
- Prioritize improvements by impact
Output Format:
- Executive summary
- Detailed findings
- Risk assessment
- Improvement roadmap
- Code examples where relevant
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 245 tokens per session scan A bd3a4ada9cb1
code-analysis is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository steipete/agent-rules (5,677 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 245 tokens to every session, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
knip
Knip dead-code policy: why each override in root knip.jsonc exists, and how the default and production passes feed the PR code-quality report.
quality-report
PR code-quality report: non-blocking Knip and jscpd diff against the merge base, isolated write token, sticky comment, and the .jscpd.json rationale.
code-style
Code style - OXC decides; thin handlers; unknown only at I/O boundaries; oxlint suppression form; strict tsconfig flags.
general_clean_code_principles
Clean code principles for better readability.
review
Structured code review with severity ratings — CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW.
analyze
Codebase analysis — complexity, coupling, dead code, tech debt hotspots.