codegraph

Instructions for using CodeGraph, a code index that records files, symbols, and their relationships.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find symbols, inspect signatures and source, trace calls, explore related code, and assess the impact of changing a function or file.
Why use it?
It helps answer structural code questions such as where a function is defined, what calls it, and what changes might affect it.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/superman1006/meetmind/codegraph
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/superman1006/MeetMind

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 819 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 819 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00819 $0.00819
Opus 5 $0.00409 $0.00409
Sonnet 5 $0.00164 $0.00164
Haiku 4.5 $0.00082 $0.00082

Measured 2d ago against content hash b7113a7f7a9b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codegraph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to codegraph — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.cursor/rules/codegraph.mdc · 40 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 40 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

CodeGraph

This project has a CodeGraph MCP server (codegraph_* tools) configured. CodeGraph is a tree-sitter-parsed knowledge graph of every symbol, edge, and file. Reads are sub-millisecond and return structural information grep cannot.

When to prefer codegraph over native search

Use codegraph for structural questions — what calls what, what would break, where is X defined, what is X's signature. Use native grep/read only for literal text queries (string contents, comments, log messages) or after you already have a specific file open.

Question Tool
"Where is X defined?" / "Find symbol named X" codegraph_search
"What calls function Y?" codegraph_callers
"What does Y call?" codegraph_callees
"How does X reach/become Y? / trace the flow from X to Y" codegraph_trace (one call = the whole path, incl. callback/React/JSX dynamic hops)
"What would break if I changed Z?" codegraph_impact
"Show me Y's signature / source / docstring" codegraph_node
"Give me focused context for a task/area" codegraph_context
"See several related symbols' source at once" codegraph_explore
"What files exist under path/" codegraph_files
"Is the index healthy?" codegraph_status

Rules of thumb

  • Answer directly — don't delegate exploration. For "how does X work" / architecture questions, answer with 2-3 codegraph calls: codegraph_context first, then ONE codegraph_explore for the source of the symbols it surfaces. For a specific flow ("how does X reach Y") start with codegraph_trace from→to — one call returns the whole path with dynamic hops bridged — then ONE codegraph_explore for the bodies; don't rebuild the path with codegraph_search + codegraph_callers. Codegraph IS the pre-built index, so spawning a separate file-reading sub-task/agent — or running a grep + read loop — repeats work codegraph already did and costs more for the same answer.
  • Trust codegraph results. They come from a full AST parse. Do NOT re-verify them with grep — that's slower, less accurate, and wastes context.
  • Don't grep first when looking up a symbol by name. codegraph_search is faster and returns kind + location + signature in one call.
  • Don't chain codegraph_search + codegraph_node when you just want context — codegraph_context is one call.
  • Don't loop codegraph_node over many symbols — one codegraph_explore call returns several symbols' source grouped in a single capped call, while each separate node/Read call re-reads the whole context and costs far more.
  • Index lag — check the staleness banner, don't guess a wait. When a codegraph response starts with "⚠️ Some files referenced below were edited since the last index sync…", the listed files are pending re-index — Read those specific files for accurate content. Files NOT in that banner are fresh and codegraph is authoritative for them. codegraph_status also lists pending files under "Pending sync".

Read the full file on GitHub · 40 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 40 lines · 819 tokens per session scan A b7113a7f7a9b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codegraph is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository superman1006/MeetMind (57 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 819 tokens to every session, about $0.0041 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to codegraph, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.