Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/supertokens/create-supertokens-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/go)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/go/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/go.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01741 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00696 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00348 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
go scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go
| factor | go imports | go inits |
|---|---|---|
emailpassword |
import ( "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/emailpassword") | emailpassword.Init(nil), |
thirdparty |
import ( "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/thirdparty" "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/thirdparty/tpmodels") | thirdparty.Init(&tpmodels.TypeInput{ SignInAndUpFeature: tpmodels.TypeInputSignInAndUp{ Providers: []tpmodels.ProviderInput{ // per-provider config }, }, }, }), |
link_email |
import ( "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless" "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless/plessmodels") | passwordless.Init(plessmodels.TypeInput{ FlowType: "MAGIC_LINK", ContactMethodEmailOrPhone: plessmodels.ContactMethodEmailOrPhoneConfig{ Enabled: true, }, }), |
link_phone |
import ( "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless" "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless/plessmodels") | passwordless.Init(plessmodels.TypeInput{ FlowType: "MAGIC_LINK", ContactMethodEmailOrPhone: plessmodels.ContactMethodEmailOrPhoneConfig{ Enabled: true, }, }), |
otp_phone |
import ( "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless" "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless/plessmodels") | passwordless.Init(plessmodels.TypeInput{ FlowType: "USER_INPUT_CODE_AND_MAGIC_LINK", ContactMethodEmailOrPhone: plessmodels.ContactMethodEmailOrPhoneConfig{ Enabled: true, }, }), |
otp_email |
import ( "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless" "github.com/supertokens/supertokens-golang/recipe/passwordless/plessmodels") | passwordless.Init(plessmodels.TypeInput{ FlowType: "USER_INPUT_CODE_AND_MAGIC_LINK", ContactMethodEmailOrPhone: plessmodels.ContactMethodEmailOrPhoneConfig{ Enabled: true, }, }), |
Notes:
- session, dashboard, userroles also imported for all factors, in addition to their own config.
- There's no MFA for GO currently, so only a first factor input would be valid.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 09e4efeccef8
go is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository supertokens/create-supertokens-app (24 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,741 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
go-backend-scalability-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with backend scalability.
backend
You are an expert in Go, Gin, Gorm, Gen, Cosy (https://cosy.uozi.org/) with a deep understanding of best practices and performance optimization techniques in these technologies.
go-servemux-rest-api-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with ServeMux REST API integration.
telegram-bot-general
Project-wide conventions for Telegram Bot library.
go-grpc-service-rule
A set of Chinese-language rules for implementing gRPC services in Go. gRPC is a way for software services to communicate using defined messages and procedures.
shared-libraries
Shared libraries - condition framework, inventory containers, file-backed DB, itinerary, references.