Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/supertokens/create-supertokens-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/typescript)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/typescript"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/typescript/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/typescript"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/supertokens/create-supertokens-app/typescript.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02967 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01187 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00593 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00297 |
Grade A, and why
typescript scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 324 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TypeScript
| factor | ts imports | ts inits |
|---|---|---|
emailpassword |
import EmailPassword from "supertokens-node/recipe/emailpassword"; | EmailPassword.init() |
thirdparty |
import ThirdParty from "supertokens-node/recipe/thirdparty"; | ThirdParty.init({ signInAndUpFeature: { providers: [ // per-provider config ], }, }), |
link_email |
import Passwordless from "supertokens-node/recipe/passwordless"; | Passwordless.init({ contactMethod: "EMAIL", flowType: MAGIC_LINK", }), |
link_phone |
import Passwordless from "supertokens-node/recipe/passwordless"; | Passwordless.init({ contactMethod: "PHONE", flowType: "MAGIC_LINK", }), |
otp_phone |
import Passwordless from "supertokens-node/recipe/passwordless"; | Passwordless.init({ contactMethod: "PHONE", flowType: "USER_INPUT_CODE", }), |
otp_email |
import Passwordless from "supertokens-node/recipe/passwordless"; | Passwordless.init({ contactMethod: "EMAIL", flowType: "USER_INPUT_CODE", }), |
totp |
import totp from "supertokens-node/recipe/totp" | totp.init(), |
Notes:
- Session, Dashboard, UserRoles also imported for all factors, in addition to their own config.
- if both link_email and link_phone are present as factors, the contactMethod in init becomes "EMAIL_OR_PASSWORD".
- if both otp_email and otp_phone are present as factors, the flowType in init becomes "USER_INPUT_CODE_AND_MAGIC_LINK".
- If a second factor is present, always include the MultiFactorAuth recipe.
- For any MultiFactor recipes, also include AccountLinking and EmailVerification.
- Second factors specific behavior always go in the override function of the MultiFactorAuth recipe!
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 324 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 69ce414c855e
typescript is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository supertokens/create-supertokens-app (24 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,967 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
django-python
Rules for writing Python services at PostHog (Python servers powered by the Django framework).
typescript-patterns
Cursor rule "typescript-patterns" from fmflurry/settings-opencode, covering typescript/javascript patterns, api response format, custom hooks pattern and repository pattern.
python--typescript-guide-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python development with TypeScript guide integration.
standard-nestjs-module-hierarchy
Establish a consistent NestJS module structure in the API application where each resource is encapsulated in its own module with proper hierarchical organization to enhance maintainability, scalabilit... .
nestjs-best-practices
../../.claude/rules/nestjs-best-practices.md.
telegram-bot-general
Project-wide conventions for Telegram Bot library.