implementation-review-workflow

implementation-review-workflow is a cursor rule for Cursor from TACC/HPCPerfStats. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,140 once invoked), scanned A, original, LGPL-2.1.

A software implementation review rule that requires planning, clarification when information is missing, and a self-review after coding.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps structure the work before implementation and check the result afterward.
Why use it?
It reduces mistakes caused by coding before the requirements and surrounding context are understood.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: a Cursor rule (.mdc).

Good fit It helps structure the work before implementation and check the result afterward.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TACC/HPCPerfStats

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for implementation-review-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for implementation-review-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tacc/hpcperfstats/implementation-review-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 1,140 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01140
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00456
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00228
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00114

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 50434ae01da4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implementation-review-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

hpcperfstats/cursor-rules/implementation-review-workflow.mdc · 53 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed LGPL-2.1

The repository is licensed LGPL-2.1, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 50434ae01da4
  2. 1mo ago Changed 3452566f9eef
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 34488e8ae9f6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implementation-review-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository TACC/HPCPerfStats (59 stars, last pushed today), licensed LGPL-2.1. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,140 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.