airsup-failures

airsup-failures is a cursor rule for Cursor from tadeus123/airsup2. It costs 16 tokens per session (125 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A rule for handling questions about failures or broken parts of Airsup, though no further Airsup details are provided here.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for running the failures report when a user asks what is failing or broken in Airsup.
Why use it?
It ensures those questions use the failures report rather than an unsupported answer.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/tadeus123/airsup2/airsup-failures
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tadeus123/airsup2

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for airsup-failures

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tadeus123/airsup2/airsup-failures.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/tadeus123/airsup2/airsup-failures)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tadeus123/airsup2/airsup-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tadeus123/airsup2/airsup-failures.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 125 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00016 $0.00125
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00063
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00025
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00013

Measured 3d ago against content hash c9f15852f7a9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

airsup-failures scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/airsup-failures.mdc · 17 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 17 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A c9f15852f7a9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

airsup-failures is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository tadeus123/airsup2 (0 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 125 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.