Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/teacat99/gl-mcp-feedbackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/teacat99/gl-mcp-feedback/web-frontend-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/teacat99/gl-mcp-feedback/web-frontend-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/teacat99/gl-mcp-feedback/web-frontend-architecture.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01338 | $0.01338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00669 | $0.00669 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00268 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00134 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
web-frontend-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 86 lines · 1,338 tokens per session scan A 4c76ea9f8e46
web-frontend-architecture is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository teacat99/gl-mcp-feedback (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 1,338 tokens to every session, about $0.0067 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It comes from a forked repository.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
laravel-tall-stack-best-practices-cursorrules-prom
Cursor rules for Laravel development with TALL Stack best practices.
python-fastapi-scalable-api-cursorrules-prompt-fil
Cursor rules for Python FastAPI development with scalable API integration.
htmx-go-fiber-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with Fiber integration.
laravel-tall-stack-best-practices-cursorrules-prom
Cursor rules for Laravel development with TALL Stack best practices.
htmx-django-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for HTMX development with Django integration.
htmx-flask-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for HTMX development with Flask integration.