Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/technickai/ai-coding-config/autonomous-development-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechNickAI/ai-coding-configWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00624 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00312 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
autonomous-development-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autonomous Development Workflow
For AI agents completing tasks without human supervision. The goal: deliver a clean pull request that passes all checks and gets merged without back-and-forth.
Spec Quality Is the Bottleneck
Invest more time understanding the problem than writing the implementation. A precise understanding of the problem produces better code than any amount of iteration on an ambiguous one. If the task description is ambiguous, clarify before implementing. Quick, localized changes with no behavioral impact may proceed directly.
Before Implementation
Assess whether you have enough clarity to implement correctly. Can you articulate the problem being solved, what "done" looks like, the edge cases, and the assumptions you're making? If not, ask before proceeding.
Load project standards via /load-rules. If that's not available, fall back to reading
applicable rules directly. Every applicable rule must be followed.
If CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md exist in the project root, read those for additional
context.
Implementation
Write code following all cursor rules. Reference specific rules by reading the files directly.
Validation - Use the Tooling
The project has tooling configured. We use it instead of manually trying to comply.
Check for pre-commit and run if exists:
[ -f .pre-commit-config.yaml ] && pre-commit run --all-files
Read .github/workflows/build.yml (or ci.yml, test.yml) and replicate those validation
steps locally, for example:
ruff check --fix . # Auto-fix linting
ruff format . # Auto-format code
pytest # Run tests
If we added functionality, we add tests following project patterns. Aim for 95% coverage -- solid testing without obsessing over every edge case.
Only commit and push when all validation passes.
Evaluate Outcomes
Run git diff and review the changes at the feature level. The question isn't "is every
line correct" -- it's "does this changeset solve the problem cleanly?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 90 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 7380b0374eaa
autonomous-development-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository TechNickAI/ai-coding-config (24 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 624 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
infra-devops
Infrastructure, Cloud, Terraform, Docker & CI/CD Agent.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
typescript
Changes to these high-fan-out internals can affect every message, delta, element, or rerun. Keep work in them minimal, and benchmark changes with representative stress-test apps.
coolify-ai-docs
Master reference to all Coolify AI documentation in .ai/ directory.
python_lib
Tips and guidelines specific to the development of the Streamlit Python library, not applicable to scripts and e2e tests.