Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechNickAI/claude_telemetryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/technickai/claude_telemetry/ruff-linting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/technickai/claude_telemetry/ruff-linting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/technickai/claude_telemetry/ruff-linting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/technickai/claude_telemetry/ruff-linting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/technickai/claude_telemetry/ruff-linting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.00227 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00091 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
ruff-linting scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
process = subprocess.Popen(["pbcopy"], stdin=subprocess.PIPE) # ruff: ignore=S603,S607 - Needed for clipboard Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- ruff-linting — 92% identical, 1 lines differ
What it actually says
Ruff Linting
We use ruff for linting. If there are lint errors, or if the user says "fix lint
errors":
- Run:
ruff check --fix --unsafe-fixes - Repeat until all errors are fixed
Using Targeted Ignores
For legitimate exceptions, use targeted ignores with specific rule codes and explanations:
# Include the rule code and why we're ignoring it
process = subprocess.Popen(["pbcopy"], stdin=subprocess.PIPE) # ruff: ignore=S603,S607 - Needed for clipboard
result = eval(user_formula) # ruff: ignore=S307 - Safe: formula validated by parser
api_key = os.getenv("SECRET_KEY") # ruff: ignore=S105 - Environment variable, not hardcoded
Use # ruff: ignore=RULE_CODE format. Multiple rules: # ruff: ignore=S603,S607
When we fix all errors, celebrate! Clean code feels good. 🌟
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A fbc74bfcdeb9
ruff-linting is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository TechNickAI/claude_telemetry (31 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 227 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
release-checklist
What to update with each code change or version release.
modus-checkbox-value-inversion-react-short
Critical bug fix for ModusWcCheckbox value property inversion.
pre-flight-check
Mandatory fail-fast quality gate — run Typecheck, Lint, Test, and Security Audit sequentially before declaring any task done or committing code.
05-daemons-ipc
Use this rule to understand the roles of the HAPPE/IDA/mcp-hostd daemons, how HAPPE and IDA communicate via IPC, find the IPC message structure definitions, trace the memory retrieval flow, and identify daemon responsibilities.
graphql
GraphQL: schema design, resolvers, performance.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.