git-workflow

A set of project rules for Git, the version-control system used to track code changes. It defines branch names, commit-message format, and checks to run before opening a pull request or pushing changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when creating branches, writing commits, preparing pull requests, and validating changes with checks, builds, and tests.
Why use it?
It prevents unrelated work from being mixed together and helps catch failures before changes are reviewed or released.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/tecnomanu/mcp-telegram-agent/git-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tecnomanu/mcp-telegram-agent

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 261 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 261 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00261 $0.00261
Opus 5 $0.00130 $0.00130
Sonnet 5 $0.00052 $0.00052
Haiku 4.5 $0.00026 $0.00026

Measured yesterday against content hash cf967ec45235, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/git-workflow.mdc · 52 lines

What it actually says

Git Workflow Rules

Branch Strategy

feature/*  ---> PR ---> main
fix/*      ---> PR ---> main
hotfix/*   ---> main (emergency only)
  • main is release-only.
  • Avoid direct development on main.
  • One branch per responsibility.
  • Do not mix unrelated changes.

Commit Format

Use English Conventional Commits with emoji:

  • feat(scope): ✨ add feature
  • fix(scope): 🐛 fix bug
  • docs(scope): 📝 update docs
  • refactor(scope): ♻️ refactor code
  • test(scope): ✅ add/update tests
  • chore(scope): 🔧 maintenance

Required Validation Before PR/Push

Run:

npm run check
npm run build
npm run test

Rules:

  • Keep tests green.
  • If behavior changes, update tests.

Onboarding Execution Rule

  • If user asks to install/configure this MCP, execute tools end-to-end.
  • Do not stop at explanation-only responses.
  • Require explicit chat_id confirmation before finalizing onboarding.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 52 lines · 261 tokens per session scan A cf967ec45235

Subscribe to this mod's changes

git-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository tecnomanu/mcp-telegram-agent (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 261 tokens to every session, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.