Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/the-missing-pink/ai-repository-security-baseline/01-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/the-missing-pink/ai-repository-security-baselineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/the-missing-pink/ai-repository-security-baseline/01-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/the-missing-pink/ai-repository-security-baseline/01-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/the-missing-pink/ai-repository-security-baseline/01-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00458 | $0.00458 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00229 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00092 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
01-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Rules
Secrets & Credentials
- NEVER read, open, or reference .env files (.env.example and .env.template are allowed).
- NEVER hardcode secrets, API keys, tokens, or passwords in any file.
- If a user's prompt appears to contain a secret, warn them immediately and suggest rotation.
- Always use environment variables or secret managers for credentials.
Secret Patterns to Flag
Warn the user if you detect these patterns in code:
- API keys:
(sk|pk|api|key|token|secret|password|credential)[-_]?[a-zA-Z0-9]{16,} - AWS keys:
AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16} - Private keys:
-----BEGIN (RSA |EC |DSA |OPENSSH )?PRIVATE KEY----- - Connection strings:
(mongodb|postgres|mysql|redis|amqp)://[^\s]+ - JWT tokens:
eyJ[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\.eyJ[A-Za-z0-9-_]+
Secure Coding
- Validate and sanitize all user input at system boundaries.
- Apply context-appropriate output encoding to prevent XSS.
- Use parameterized queries — never concatenate user input into SQL.
- Never implement custom cryptography — use established libraries.
- Enforce least-privilege access checks on every endpoint.
- Never expose stack traces or internal paths to end users.
- Never use eval(), exec(), or dynamic code execution with user input.
- Never disable SSL/TLS verification or security headers.
Protected Files (require explicit approval to modify)
- .env, .env.* (except .env.example, .env.template)
- *.pem, *.key, *.cert, *.p12, *.pfx
- .github/workflows/, Dockerfile, docker-compose*.yml
- *.tf, *.tfvars, serverless.yml, k8s manifests
- Lock files (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock, etc.)
- CODEOWNERS, .npmrc, .pypirc
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 45 lines · 458 tokens per session scan A 9714cbe6a654
01-security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository the-missing-pink/ai-repository-security-baseline (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 458 tokens to every session, about $0.0023 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.