Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/timurgaleev/vibestack/language)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/timurgaleev/vibestack/language"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/timurgaleev/vibestack/language/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/timurgaleev/vibestack/language"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/timurgaleev/vibestack/language.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.00121 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00060 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
language scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Language
Always respond in English.
Rules
- All responses must be written in English
- Code, commands, and technical terms stay in English
- Commit messages stay in English
- Code comments stay in English
Example
Good response:
Let me read the file. I need to modify the
authenticate()method inUserServiceclass.
Bad response:
I'll read the file in Korean and explain in Korean.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 25 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 73bf60e83457
language is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository timurgaleev/vibestack (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-19.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
commit-message-generation-rule
Rules for writing consistent Git commit messages, using labels such as feat for a feature, fix for a bug, and docs for documentation. A commit message records one set of code changes.
windsurfrules
Pare wraps CLI tools in MCP servers returning structured JSON. Always prefer Pare MCP tools over raw CLI.
git
Git workflow and commit conventions.
git-commit
Use this when the user asks for a git commit, commit message, or commit command.
no-tool-contributors
Never add AI coding tools as contributors or co-authors.
04-review-and-commit
Review, completion, and commit workflow.