Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vahlame/create-vkm-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/vahlame/create-vkm-kit/30-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vahlame/create-vkm-kit/30-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vahlame/create-vkm-kit/30-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vahlame/create-vkm-kit/30-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vahlame/create-vkm-kit/30-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00173 | $0.00173 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00069 | $0.00069 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
30-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A f2e60a5f9a1d
30-security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Vahlame/create-vkm-kit (4 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 173 tokens to every session, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
error-log
Apply when learning from a mistake. Central memory of past errors and derived rules; consult before logging a new error to avoid duplicates.
react
Apply when writing React components. Hook discipline, state placement, performance, async cleanup, and list keys.
python
Apply when writing Python code. Type hints, error handling, mutable defaults, async patterns, and packaging conventions.
self-extension-workflow
Apply when executing the self-extension workflow. Six steps from a mistake to a merged rule, with CI gates and CODEOWNERS approval.
typescript
Apply when writing TypeScript code. Strict types, discriminated unions, async patterns, and runtime safety.
svg-check
Apply when editing, generating, or reviewing any SVG diagram. Pixel-perfect Playwright bbox-check is the acceptance test — eyeballing is not sufficient. Run on every SVG before declaring done.