Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/30-framework-routing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/30-framework-routing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/30-framework-routing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/30-framework-routing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/30-framework-routing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01016 | $0.01016 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00508 | $0.00508 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00203 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00102 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
30-framework-routing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Framework Routing
When intent is unclear
Load using-compliance-agent-skills first.
Routing table
| Signals | Primary skill | Preset |
|---|---|---|
| ePHI, BAA, Security Rule | hipaa-technical-safeguards |
healthcare-hipaa |
| Presidio, redaction pipeline | hipaa-phi-redaction-pipeline |
healthcare-hipaa |
| Minimum necessary, de-id | hipaa-privacy-minimum-necessary |
healthcare-hipaa |
| LLM vendor BAA | hipaa-baa-vendor-assessment |
healthcare-hipaa |
| Checkout scripts, Req 6.4.3 | pci-dss-script-audit |
fintech-pci-dss |
| CDE, firewall, segmentation | pci-dss-network-segmentation |
fintech-pci-dss |
| PAN encryption, key management | pci-dss-encryption-key-management |
fintech-pci-dss |
| TSC mapping, SOC 2 scope | soc2-trust-services-criteria |
saas-soc2-type2 |
| Evidence binder | soc2-evidence-collection |
saas-soc2-type2 |
| CCM, drift dashboards | soc2-ccm-continuous-monitoring |
saas-soc2-type2 |
| ISO 27001 Annex A, SoA | iso27001-annex-a-controls |
any |
| NIST CSF 2.0 profile | nist-csf-2-assessment |
any |
| CCPA, CPRA, DSAR | ccpa-cpra-privacy-rights |
any |
| FedRAMP, SSP, 800-53 | fedramp-moderate-baseline |
financial-services-glba |
| SOX ITGC, SOX 404 | sox-itgc-audit |
financial-services-glba |
| CMMC, CUI, 800-171 | cmmc-nist-800-171 |
enterprise-regulated |
| GLBA, FFIEC, NPI | glba-ffiec-financial-privacy |
financial-services-glba |
| HITECH, OCR breach, unsecured PHI | hitech-breach-notification |
healthcare-hipaa |
| US state privacy (VCDPA, CPA, TX) | us-state-privacy-laws |
multinational-privacy |
| GDPR, EU data subjects, SCCs | gdpr-us-multinational |
multinational-privacy |
| NIST AI RMF, trustworthy AI | nist-ai-rmf-governance |
edtech-youth-privacy |
| FERPA, education records | ferpa-education-records |
edtech-youth-privacy |
| COPPA, under 13, child app | coppa-children-privacy |
edtech-youth-privacy |
| IAM, MFA, RBAC | access-control-identity-audit |
any |
| Logs, SIEM, Req 10 | audit-logging-integrity |
any |
| Breach, incident | breach-incident-response |
healthcare-hipaa |
| Vendor SOC reports | vendor-third-party-risk |
any |
| OPA, Terraform, CI gates | compliance-as-code-governance |
cloud presets |
| MCP OAuth, tool scope | mcp-compliance-integration |
regulated-ai-agents |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 62 lines · 1,016 tokens per session scan A fe3d0b6ac213
30-framework-routing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,016 tokens to every session, about $0.0051 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
compliance-trestle
Compliance Trestle repository rules.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.