Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vepo/issuesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/vepo/issues/issues-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vepo/issues/issues-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vepo/issues/issues-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vepo/issues/issues-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vepo/issues/issues-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00440 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
issues-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test conventions
Part of development-process.mdc phase 5. Every approved task must have corresponding tests listed in the feature changelog Test coverage table before the entry is marked done.
Annotations
@QuarkusTeston REST integration tests.- Plain JUnit for unit tests (e.g.
TicketHistoryServiceTest,ArchitectureTest).
REST Assured
- Test HTTP via REST Assured against
@QuarkusTestrunning app. - Authenticate with JWT from login endpoint or test helpers when needed.
Given builder
Giveninsrc/test/java/dev/vepo/issues/Given.java— seed users, projects, tickets.- Prefer
Givenover duplicating SQL in each test. - Call cleanup when tests mutate shared state (if extended).
Domain narrative
- Method names:
shouldMoveTicketWhenTransitionIsValid(). - Structure: given context → when action → then assertion on domain outcome.
- Meaningful assertions — not
isNotNull()alone.
Architecture tests
- Run
ArchitectureTestwhen adding/changing*Request/*Responseor endpoints.
Forbidden
@Disabledto hide failures.Thread.sleep()— use Awaitility for async/SSE if needed.- Weakening assertions to force green.
- Leaving Red-phase tests failing at session end without revert — complete Green or revert the test and production stub.
Example
@Test
void shouldCreateTicketWithProjectPrefixIdentifier() {
var project = Given.aProjectWithPrefix("ISS");
var response = given()
.body(new CreateTicketRequest(project.id(), "Title", "Desc", null))
.when().post("/api/tickets")
.then().statusCode(200)
.extract().as(TicketResponse.class);
assertThat(response.identifier()).startsWith("ISS-");
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1af94394ffa3
issues-tests is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository vepo/issues (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 440 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
architecture
This document outlines the fundamental architectural principles and patterns for the mcp-debug codebase. Adherence to these guidelines is mandatory to maintain a clean, decoupled, and testable system.
300-testing
Comprehensive testing guide covering unit, integration, E2E, test frameworks, patterns, and CI/CD integration.
hatch3r-testing
Coverage thresholds, mocking strategy, property-based testing, mutation-score targets, flaky test quarantine, and snapshot test discipline.
testing
Cursor rule "testing" from andersonlemesc/Oryntra, covering testes oryntra, laravel (pest), python (pytest), contract tests (laravel ↔ python) and browser/e2e.
tester
Tester role - Unit, E2E, and visual regression testing.
go-test
Rules for writing and modifying test files (test.go) in go-crypto-wallet.