Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibestackdev/vibe-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/file-uploads)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/file-uploads"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/file-uploads/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/file-uploads"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/file-uploads.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00737 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00295 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
file-uploads scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
File Upload Security Rules
RULE 1: NEVER Upload Directly From Client to Supabase Storage With the Anon Key
Client-side uploads with the anon key allow users to upload to any bucket path. Always generate a signed upload URL server-side, scoped to the authenticated user.
✅ CORRECT — server generates signed URL:
// Server Action
'use server'
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'
export async function getUploadUrl(filename: string, contentType: string) {
const supabase = await createClient()
const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getUser()
if (!user) throw new Error('Unauthorized')
// Scope the path to the user's ID — prevents path traversal
const path = `${user.id}/${Date.now()}-${filename}`
const { data, error } = await supabase.storage
.from('uploads')
.createSignedUploadUrl(path)
if (error) throw error
return { signedUrl: data.signedUrl, path }
}
❌ WRONG — direct client upload with anon key:
// Client Component -- exposes storage to manipulation
const { data, error } = await supabase.storage
.from('uploads')
.upload(`${filename}`, file) // No user scoping — any path writable
RULE 2: Validate File Type and Size Server-Side
Client-side validation is bypassed trivially. Always re-validate on the server.
✅ CORRECT:
const ALLOWED_TYPES = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/webp']
const MAX_SIZE_BYTES = 5 * 1024 * 1024 // 5MB
export async function POST(request: NextRequest) {
const formData = await request.formData()
const file = formData.get('file') as File
if (!file) return NextResponse.json({ error: 'No file provided' }, { status: 400 })
if (!ALLOWED_TYPES.includes(file.type)) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Invalid file type' }, { status: 400 })
}
if (file.size > MAX_SIZE_BYTES) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'File too large' }, { status: 400 })
}
// Safe to process
}
RULE 3: Always Scope Storage Paths to User ID
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 78c9ed3ce996
file-uploads is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository vibestackdev/vibe-stack (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 737 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
components
React component, styling, theme, accessibility, and RTL instructions.
vibe-tools
Global Rule. This rule should ALWAYS be loaded.
multi-zone-architecture
Multi-zone architecture allows Shipkit applications to be split into multiple Next.js applications while appearing as a single domain to users. This pattern is ideal for.
database-patterns
Use the createTable function with consistent naming.
documentation-system
The Shipkit documentation system uses dynamic file-based loading from the /docs directory at the project root. It supports both .mdx and .md files with full production-ready security features.
local-storage-patterns
Shipkit uses browser local storage as a fallback when no database is configured. This provides a zero-config development experience while maintaining feature parity with database mode.