git-conventions

A set of Git rules for organizing AI-assisted development, including branch names, Conventional Commit messages, checks before committing, and review of generated code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when starting AI coding sessions, creating branches, naming commits, running linting, type checks, tests, and reviewing generated changes.
Why use it?
It gives a consistent way to separate work, describe changes, and catch problems before they enter the project history.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/git-conventions
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibestackdev/vibe-stack

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 177 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00177
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00088
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00035
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00018

Measured yesterday against content hash f9decd5c5a5c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

git-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/git-conventions.mdc · 29 lines

What it actually says

Git Conventions for Vibe Coders

Commit convention (Conventional Commits):

  • feat: add user authentication
  • fix: resolve RLS policy for shared projects
  • chore: update dependencies
  • docs: add API documentation
  • refactor: extract auth helper to separate module

Branch naming:

  • feature/auth-flow
  • fix/rls-policy-bug
  • chore/update-dependencies

ALWAYS run before commit (if available):

  1. npm run lint
  2. npm run type-check
  3. npm test

AI session workflow:

  • Create a new branch before starting any AI session
  • Review ALL AI-generated code before committing
  • Break large AI generations into multiple focused commits
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 29 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f9decd5c5a5c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

git-conventions is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository vibestackdev/vibe-stack (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 177 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.