Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibestackdev/vibe-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/middleware-auth)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/middleware-auth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/middleware-auth/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/middleware-auth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/vibestackdev/vibe-stack/middleware-auth.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00524 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
middleware-auth scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Middleware Auth Rules
RULE 1: Middleware is for Session REFRESH, Not Auth Enforcement
SECURITY CRITICAL: Next.js middleware CANNOT securely enforce authentication.
Middleware runs on the Edge Runtime and cannot verify Supabase JWTs reliably.
The ONLY job of middleware is to call updateSession() to refresh the token.
✅ CORRECT — middleware only refreshes:
// middleware.ts
import { updateSession } from '@/lib/supabase/middleware'
import { type NextRequest } from 'next/server'
export async function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
return await updateSession(request) // Refresh only — no auth logic here
}
export const config = {
matcher: ['/((?!_next/static|_next/image|favicon.ico).*)'],
}
❌ WRONG — do NOT put auth enforcement in middleware:
// VULNERABILITY: middleware auth check can be bypassed
export async function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const session = await getSession() // Wrong: unreliable in Edge Runtime
if (!session) return NextResponse.redirect('/login') // Can be bypassed
}
RULE 2: Auth Enforcement Belongs in Layouts and Pages
Every protected route must call getUser() server-side in the layout or page component.
This is the cryptographically secure check.
✅ CORRECT — auth in layout:
// app/(protected)/layout.tsx
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'
import { redirect } from 'next/navigation'
export default async function ProtectedLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
const supabase = await createClient()
const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getUser()
if (!user) redirect('/login')
return <>{children}</>
}
RULE 3: Never Check Auth in Client Components
Auth state from Client Components can be spoofed through browser devtools.
The server-side getUser() call in layouts is the source of truth.
❌ WRONG:
'use client'
// Do NOT gate features based on client-side auth state alone
const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getSession() // Untrusted
if (!user) return <LoginPrompt />
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 536845889519
middleware-auth is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository vibestackdev/vibe-stack (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 524 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
components
React component, styling, theme, accessibility, and RTL instructions.
vibe-tools
Global Rule. This rule should ALWAYS be loaded.
multi-zone-architecture
Multi-zone architecture allows Shipkit applications to be split into multiple Next.js applications while appearing as a single domain to users. This pattern is ideal for.
database-patterns
Use the createTable function with consistent naming.
documentation-system
The Shipkit documentation system uses dynamic file-based loading from the /docs directory at the project root. It supports both .mdx and .md files with full production-ready security features.
local-storage-patterns
Shipkit uses browser local storage as a fallback when no database is configured. This provides a zero-config development experience while maintaining feature parity with database mode.