Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/virastack/aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/virastack/ai/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/virastack/ai/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/virastack/ai/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/virastack/ai/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/virastack/ai/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00454 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Testing Guide (Pragmatic)
Principles
- Value over Coverage: Focus on testing complex business logic in
features/[feature]. Skip simple UI components unless critical. - Behavior Testing: Focus on user outcomes (Arrange-Act-Assert).
- Accessible Queries: Prefer
getByRole/findByRole(and label text) over test IDs so tests enforce keyboard-reachable UI.
Tech Stack
- Vitest & React Testing Library.
- Do not add Playwright/browser E2E unless the project already has it or the user explicitly asks.
Preferences (Not Hard Rules)
- API: Use
MSWfor stable features; simple mocks are okay for rapid prototyping. - Location: Keep
.test.tsnext to implementation. - Snapshots: Use only for small, static data structures to prevent maintenance hell.
- UI changes: For critical flows, cover loading / empty / error / success paths in RTL. Breakpoint and visual polish checks belong to the
ui-components.mdcDelivery Checklist, not unit tests.
Mandatory Patterns
1. Async UI Testing (AAA Pattern)
ALWAYS use userEvent for interactions and findBy* for async assertions. Mock APIs via MSW.
// Act await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /login/i }));
// Assert expect(await screen.findByText(/invalid credentials/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); });
Correct Implementation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c8f758292527
testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository virastack/ai (23 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 454 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
python-general-coding-standards
A set of general standards for Python projects, including type hints, input checking, code style, security, web requests, background work, and tests. It also covers FastAPI-specific tasks such as CORS and authentication.
go
Go development guidelines — error handling, concurrency, interfaces, context propagation, and testing. Applied when working with Go code.
marker-insights
Aggregate Marker.io website feedback into recurring patterns. Use when asked to find the most common issues on a site, which pages get the most feedback, recurring content problems, or the content-vs-bug split across many Marker.io reports, and produce a prioritized brief for a website team or agency. Read-only: it…
rule-09
This is test rule number in the large package scalability test.
extract-functions
Extract and analyze functions from source code for unit test generation.
flutter-testing-rules
Specifies testing guidelines for Flutter projects, covering unit, widget, and integration tests.