Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rules/react-advanced-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rules/react-advanced-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rules/react-advanced-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rules/react-advanced-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rules/react-advanced-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00573 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
react-advanced-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
React 安全实践 (Security)
本规则由
@react-advanced引用
输入验证
function useFormValidation(initialValues, validationRules) {
const [values, setValues] = useState(initialValues)
const [errors, setErrors] = useState({})
const validateField = (name, value) => {
const rules = validationRules[name]
if (!rules) return null
for (const rule of rules) {
const error = rule(value)
if (error) return error
}
return null
}
const handleChange = (name, value) => {
setValues(prev => ({ ...prev, [name]: value }))
setErrors(prev => ({ ...prev, [name]: validateField(name, value) }))
}
return { values, errors, handleChange, isValid: Object.values(errors).every(e => !e) }
}
安全 HTML 渲染 (DOMPurify)
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'
function SafeHtml({ html, className }) {
const sanitizedHtml = useMemo(() =>
DOMPurify.sanitize(html, {
ALLOWED_TAGS: ['p', 'br', 'strong', 'em', 'a'],
ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href', 'target', 'rel']
}),
[html]
)
return <div className={className} dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: sanitizedHtml }} />
}
验证规则示例
const validationRules = {
name: [
(v) => !v ? '姓名不能为空' : null,
(v) => v.length < 2 ? '姓名至少2个字符' : null,
(v) => /[<>&"']/.test(v) ? '姓名包含无效字符' : null
],
email: [
(v) => !v ? '邮箱不能为空' : null,
(v) => !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(v) ? '邮箱格式不正确' : null
],
}
原则
- MUST 验证并清理用户输入
- NEVER 直接使用
dangerouslySetInnerHTML渲染未清理的 HTML - MUST 在服务端也进行验证
引用: @react-advanced
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e89312cfd8d3
react-advanced-security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository wangqiqi/cursor-ai-rules (17 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 573 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
windsurfrules
Create detailed components with these requirements.
state-management
Use the following stack. Do not introduce or recommend Redux or React Context for shared/global state.
backend
Backend development rules for TT Studio - AI model management backend.
tanstack-start-guide
TanStack Start best practices emphasizing client-first architecture, type safety, and modern React patterns.
new-component
Workflow for creating new React components.
tanstack-react-router_routing
TanStack Router: Routing.