Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/waynesutton/markdown-siteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/convex-write-conflicts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/convex-write-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/convex-write-conflicts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/convex-write-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/convex-write-conflicts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.05192 | $0.05192 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.02077 | $0.02077 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.01038 | $0.01038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00519 | $0.00519 |
Grade A, and why
convex-write-conflicts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 777 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Preventing Write Conflicts in Convex with React
Write conflicts occur when two functions running in parallel make conflicting changes to the same table or document. This rule provides patterns to avoid these conflicts.
Understanding Write Conflicts
According to Convex documentation, write conflicts happen when:
- Multiple mutations update the same document concurrently
- A mutation reads data that changes during execution
- Mutations are called more rapidly than Convex can execute them
Convex uses optimistic concurrency control and will retry mutations automatically, but will eventually fail permanently if conflicts persist.
Backend Protection: Idempotent Mutations
Always Make Mutations Idempotent
Mutations should be safe to call multiple times with the same result.
Good Pattern:
export const completeTask = mutation({
args: { taskId: v.id("tasks") },
returns: v.null(),
handler: async (ctx, args) => {
const task = await ctx.db.get(args.taskId);
// Early return if document doesn't exist
if (!task) {
return null;
}
// Early return if already in desired state
if (task.status === "completed") {
return null;
}
// Only update if state change is needed
await ctx.db.patch(args.taskId, {
status: "completed",
completedAt: Date.now(),
});
return null;
},
});
Bad Pattern:
// This will cause conflicts if called multiple times rapidly
export const completeTask = mutation({
args: { taskId: v.id("tasks") },
returns: v.null(),
handler: async (ctx, args) => {
const task = await ctx.db.get(args.taskId);
// No check if already completed
await ctx.db.patch(args.taskId, {
status: "completed",
completedAt: Date.now(),
});
return null;
},
});
Avoid Unnecessary Reads - Patch Directly
When you only need to update fields, patch directly without reading first. Database operations throw if the document doesn't exist.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 777 lines · 5,192 tokens per session scan A e37986b48188
convex-write-conflicts is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository waynesutton/markdown-site (627 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5,192 tokens to every session, about $0.0208 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
agent-development
Python agents are typically in folders named agent-py/ or agent/ and use the sdk-python/ package.
cursorrules
Cursor rule "cursorrules" from CopilotKit/CopilotKit, covering instructions, additional command options and notes.
mobile-feature-architecture
Hybrid feature-first structure for Expo apps.
react-code.rules
React code structure and best practices for organizing components with proper ordering and performance optimization.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.