Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/waynesutton/markdown-siteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/help)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/help"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/help/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/help"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/waynesutton/markdown-site/help.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.00161 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
help scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reflect before acting
Before implementing any solution:
- Identify what's missing, incomplete, or incorrect based on the original request
- Theorize 2-3 possible root causes or approaches
- Distill to the 1-2 most probable. Only proceed after clear understanding.
If anything is unclear: ask first. Never assume.
Code confidence: don't write code until 98%+ confident in what needs to be done.
Change scope: only update files directly necessary for the request. Do not change UI, layout, or design unless instructed. Never remove features unless directly requested.
UI alerts: always use the site's existing design system for modals, alerts, and confirmations. Never use browser defaults.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A 93ab651c78c8
help is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository waynesutton/markdown-site (627 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 161 tokens to every session, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
shared-plane-packages
Pattern for creating shared plane packages that serve both migration and runtime planes.