Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/we3io/ai-assistant-rules/review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WE3io/ai-assistant-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/we3io/ai-assistant-rules/review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/we3io/ai-assistant-rules/review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/we3io/ai-assistant-rules/review-checklist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01422 | $0.01422 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00711 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00284 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00142 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 229 lines · 1,422 tokens per session scan A c1f81164157b
review-checklist is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository WE3io/ai-assistant-rules (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 1,422 tokens to every session, about $0.0071 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
Decide single- or multi-workstream (look at file naming under brain/).
cursorrules
You are an expert backend API developer. Follow these rules strictly for REST APIs, GraphQL servers, and microservices.
springboot-jpa-best-practices
Java Spring Boot + JPA 项目最佳实践，涵盖分层架构、注解、事务、异常处理、安全与代码风格等。.
python-django-general
通用的 Python 和 Django 规则，专注于编码风格、错误处理和整个项目的 Django 约定。.
error-handling-priorities
Cursor AI 编程规则精选集 | 132+ 规则，覆盖前端/后端/AI/DevOps 等 32 个领域.
error-handling-and-validation
在所有代码中优先考虑错误处理和边缘情况。定义如何管理错误、处理前置条件和实现日志记录。.