Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/wiggitywhitney/mcp-commit-story/test_suite_integritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wiggitywhitney/mcp-commit-storyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/wiggitywhitney/mcp-commit-story/test_suite_integrity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/wiggitywhitney/mcp-commit-story/test_suite_integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/wiggitywhitney/mcp-commit-story/test_suite_integrity.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00720 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00288 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
test_suite_integrity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Suite Integrity Rule
All tests in the entire test suite must pass. Never skip addressing a failing test, even if it appears unrelated to the current task.
Core Principle
- The test suite is the foundation of code quality and system reliability
- Every failing test represents a potential bug or broken functionality
- Ignoring "unrelated" test failures leads to technical debt and system instability
- Test suite integrity is a prerequisite for any code changes
Implementation Requirements
✅ DO: Always Fix All Failing Tests
# ✅ Run full test suite before any implementation
python -m pytest tests/ -v
# ✅ Fix ALL failing tests, not just related ones
python -m pytest tests/ -x --tb=short
# ✅ Verify test suite health after changes
python -m pytest tests/ --tb=short
✅ DO: Address Test Failures by Priority
- Critical System Tests: Core functionality, integration tests
- Unit Test Failures: Individual component failures
- Edge Case Tests: Boundary condition tests
- Documentation Tests: Import tests, structure validation
✅ DO: Update Tests When Implementation Changes
# ✅ Update test expectations to match new behavior
def test_enhanced_hook_content():
"""Updated test for enhanced git hook functionality."""
content = generate_hook_content()
assert "python -m mcp_commit_story.git_hook_worker" in content
assert '"$PWD"' in content
✅ DO: Maintain Backward Compatibility Tests
# ✅ Keep backward compatibility tests working
def test_custom_command_still_works():
"""Ensure legacy behavior still functions."""
custom = "echo 'hello world'"
content = generate_hook_content(custom)
assert custom in content
❌ DON'T: Skip "Unrelated" Test Failures
# ❌ Wrong - ignoring failures
pytest tests/unit/test_my_feature.py # Only testing related code
# ❌ Wrong - proceeding with failures
# "The git_utils tests are failing but that's not related to my change"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 225 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A aca71c9a7d27
test_suite_integrity is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository wiggitywhitney/mcp-commit-story (15 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,439 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.