alive-decisions

alive-decisions is a cursor rule for coding agents from with-geun/alive-analysis. It costs 39 tokens per session (748 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A rule system that records and checks decisions about analysis methods, metrics, segments, and models.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during analysis decision commands, stage changes, or discussions about metrics, statistical methods, A/B tests, segments, or model choices.
Why use it?
It stops the analysis from repeatedly suggesting alternatives that the team has already considered and rejected.

Cursor rule

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/with-geun/alive-analysis/alive-decisions
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/with-geun/alive-analysis

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for alive-decisions

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/with-geun/alive-analysis/alive-decisions.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/with-geun/alive-analysis/alive-decisions)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/with-geun/alive-analysis/alive-decisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/with-geun/alive-analysis/alive-decisions.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 748 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00039 $0.00748
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00374
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00150
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00075

Measured 5d ago against content hash 0735082de361, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

alive-decisions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

platforms/cursor/rules/alive-decisions.mdc · 81 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

alive-analysis — Analysis Decision Records

This rule activates the Decision Records check system. It prevents AI from re-proposing methodology alternatives your team has already evaluated and rejected.


When this rule applies

Activate when:

  • User runs /analysis-dr (any subcommand)
  • User runs /analysis-next (stage transition — DR check happens before agent dispatch)
  • A metric definition, statistical method, or segment scope is being decided in the current analysis
  • User mentions "지표 정의", "통계 방법", "A/B 테스트 방법", "세그먼트 기준", "모델 선택"

Decision Records Check Protocol

Step 1: Check if DRs exist

Read analyses/decisions/INDEX.md. If the file doesn't exist or has no entries: skip the rest of this protocol.

Step 2: Match DRs to current context

For each DR in the index, check relevance to the current analysis:

  • Metric DRs: Does the analysis reference a metric defined in a DR?
  • Methodology DRs: Is a statistical method being used or suggested?
  • Scope DRs: Is a segment or time window being defined?
  • Model DRs: Is an algorithm or model being selected?
  • Principle DRs: Does the analysis involve causal claims or metric proposals?

Step 3: Apply matching DRs

For each matching DR:

  1. Read the full DR file (analyses/decisions/DR-{NNN}.md)
  2. Apply its 결정 (decision) as a constraint
  3. Do NOT suggest alternatives listed as rejected in the 근거 section
  4. If you believe the DR should be reconsidered, state this explicitly — do not silently override

Acknowledge applied DRs briefly:

DR-{NNN} 적용: {one-line summary}

Step 4: Suggest new DRs when appropriate

If a significant methodology decision is made during analysis that isn't yet recorded:

  • After the analysis stage is complete, suggest: "이 결정을 DR로 기록하면 어떨까요? /analysis-dr new"
  • Especially at EVOLVE stage: any metric proposed or method standardized is a DR candidate

DR Types Reference

Type Covers Example
Metric Metric definitions DAU = 핵심 기능 1회 이상 사용
Methodology Statistical/analysis methods A/B 테스트는 베이지안, 신뢰도 95%
Scope Segment or time window 신규유저 = 가입 후 7일 이내
Model Algorithm selection 이탈 예측 = gradient boosting
Principle Analytical standards 인과관계 주장은 DiD/RD/IV 필수

Read the full file on GitHub · 81 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 81 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 0735082de361

Subscribe to this mod's changes

alive-decisions is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository with-geun/alive-analysis (41 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 748 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.