Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaozhi86/qamasterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/xiaozhi86/qamaster/requirement-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/xiaozhi86/qamaster/requirement-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/xiaozhi86/qamaster/requirement-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/xiaozhi86/qamaster/requirement-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/xiaozhi86/qamaster/requirement-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00111 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00044 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00022 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
requirement-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是 requirement-review skill。当用户要做需求评审 / 需求分析 / 多角色评审时，读取并严格执行 skills/requirement-review/SKILL.md，按其“并行评审 + 汇总仲裁”流程工作，产出写入项目根的 requirement-review/。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 31f7471cd0ff
requirement-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository xiaozhi86/qamaster (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 111 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
requirement-review compared with cursor rules from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| requirement-reviewxiaozhi86/qamaster | Cursor rule | 6 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 28 | Cursor |
| ponytailDietrichGebert/ponytail | Cursor rule | 185k | 8d ago | MIT | A | 604 | Cursor |
| angular-20angular/angular | Cursor rule | 101k | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Cursor |
| dev-standardapache/superset | Cursor rule | 75k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 1,147 | Cursor |
| prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checksprisma/orm | Cursor rule | 48k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Cursor |
| prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocksprisma/orm | Cursor rule | 48k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Cursor |
| shared-plane-packagesprisma/orm | Cursor rule | 48k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Cursor |