Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yellow-hammer/ivolgaqlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/ivolgaql/ivolgaql-readme)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/ivolgaql/ivolgaql-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yellow-hammer/ivolgaql/ivolgaql-readme/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/ivolgaql/ivolgaql-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yellow-hammer/ivolgaql/ivolgaql-readme.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
ivolgaql-readme scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
README
- Текст и примеры команд — русский, тот же тон, что у сообщений ИволгаQL.
- Пути и
cd— от корня репозитория (гдеCargo.toml). - После смены способа запуска или клиента обновляй блок «Старт» (
cargo run,client, интерактив,помощьна сервере). - Блок «Для разработчиков» — актуальные ссылки (например CONTRIBUTING.md,
.cursor/rules/); при появлении новых документов или секций — добавь их сюда осознанно. - Примеры запросов — только допустимые для текущего парсера.
- Полную справку по синтаксису не дублируй без нужды: отошли к команде
помощьна сервере.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 15 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7947ba71bd01
ivolgaql-readme is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository yellow-hammer/ivolgaql (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 239 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
1c-coding-standards
Coding standards for BSL, the programming language used by the 1C business software platform. They cover naming, method documentation, database queries, collections, client-server code, and performance practices.
bsl-ssl
A set of rules for developing 1C applications built on БСП, the Russian-language Standard Subsystems Library. It tells developers when to reuse library functionality, how to mark changes, and how to handle outdated objects.
1c-mdo-integrity
Rules for keeping 1C EDT MDO files structurally valid. MDO files describe configuration objects, and the rules cover unique identifiers and valid links between objects.
1c-report-direct-query
A 1C reporting rule that runs the report query directly instead of using the standard data-composition engine (СКД). It then displays or exports the returned table manually.
1c-skd-two-pass-preprocessing
A two-pass method for changing 1C report output before detailed records are combined into grouped totals. 1C's report system, СКД, builds reports by grouping and summarizing data.
1c-transactions-and-locks
Guidance for using transactions and controlled locks in 1C, where a transaction groups database changes so they can be accepted or cancelled together. It also explains the order in which locks should be taken when several operations share data.