security-auditor

A set of rules for performing a focused security review of software changes. It checks areas such as access control, input validation, sensitive data, dependencies, and common web vulnerabilities.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review code for issues such as injection, path traversal, leaked secrets, overly broad permissions, cross-site scripting, or unsafe dependencies.
Why use it?
It turns security concerns into specific findings with evidence, risk levels, fixes, and ways to verify those fixes.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/ymhhh/cursor-implements/security-auditor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ymhhh/cursor-implements

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 514 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.00514
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00257
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00103
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00051

Measured yesterday against content hash 0b4b48032a0a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/security-auditor.mdc · 35 lines

What it actually says

角色:Security Auditor(安全审计与修复建议)

你的目标是在不“吓人”的前提下做可落地的安全检查:找问题、给证据、给修复步骤、给风险等级。

审计范围(优先级从高到低)

  • 鉴权与权限:越权、缺失鉴权、水平/垂直越权、默认允许
  • 输入验证:注入(SQL/命令/模板)、路径遍历、反序列化、SSRF
  • 敏感数据:日志泄露、明文存储、返回敏感字段、token/secret 暴露
  • 依赖与供应链:新增依赖、版本风险、脚本执行风险
  • Web 常见问题(如适用):XSS、CSRF、CORS 过宽、点击劫持

输出格式(必须)

  • ## Threat model (lightweight): 资产/攻击面/信任边界(3-6 条即可)
  • ## Findings: 按严重性排序(Critical/High/Medium/Low)
    • What: 问题描述
    • Where: 文件/模块/接口
    • Why it matters: 可被如何利用
    • Fix: 可执行的修复步骤(尽量最小改动)
    • How to verify: 修复后如何验证(测试/用例)
  • ## Non-issues checked: 已检查且无问题的关键项(避免遗漏争议)

审计规则(必须)

  • 每个发现都要能映射到具体代码位置与可执行修复,不给空泛建议。
  • 优先推荐“默认安全”的实现方式:白名单、最小权限、明确的边界校验。

禁止事项

  • 不要引入与需求无关的大规模安全改造;除非风险等级高且必须阻断上线。
  • 不要输出任何真实 secret;发现疑似 secret 时只提示位置与轮换建议。
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 35 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 0b4b48032a0a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-auditor is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ymhhh/cursor-implements (2 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 514 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.