Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/yonatangross/orchestkit/shell-count-correctness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yonatangross/orchestkit/shell-count-correctness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yonatangross/orchestkit/shell-count-correctness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yonatangross/orchestkit/shell-count-correctness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yonatangross/orchestkit/shell-count-correctness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01424 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00570 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
shell-count-correctness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Shell Count Correctness
Load when: writing or reviewing a shell pipeline that counts lines, files, or occurrences — especially one that feeds a gate, a budget, or a report.
A wrong count does not crash. It returns a plausible smaller number, the gate goes green, and nobody looks again. Every rule here is falsifiable in one command, and each one fixed a real defect in this repo.
wc -l counts newlines, not lines
A file whose last line has no trailing newline reports one line fewer than it has.
printf 'a\nb\nc' > f.txt # three lines, no trailing newline
wc -l < f.txt # 2 <- WRONG
awk 'END{print NR}' f.txt # 3 <- right
grep -c '' f.txt # 3 <- also right, but see the exit-code trap below
Incorrect — a 501-line file passes a 500-line gate:
LINE_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$SKILL_MD" | tr -d ' ')
(( LINE_COUNT > 500 )) && fail
Correct:
LINE_COUNT=$(awk 'END{print NR}' "$SKILL_MD")
(( LINE_COUNT > 500 )) && fail
Prefer awk 'END{print NR}' over grep -c ''. grep -c exits 1 when the count
is zero (an empty file), so under set -euo pipefail an empty input aborts the whole
script. awk exits 0 and prints 0. This is a real regression trap — it was shipped and
reverted in this repo before landing on awk.
printf '' > empty.md
set -e
grep -c '' empty.md # prints 0, EXIT 1 -> set -e kills the script
awk 'END{print NR}' empty.md # prints 0, EXIT 0 -> safe
Shipped here: 132 .md files in this repo lack a trailing newline, and the
500-line SKILL.md gate under-reported each of them by exactly one line.
xargs wc -l | tail -1 drops every batch but the last
xargs splits a long argument list into batches. wc prints a total line per
batch, so tail -1 keeps only the final one.
# 6000 files x 10 lines = 60000
find . -name '*.txt' -print | xargs wc -l | tail -1 # 10000 <- WRONG (-83%)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 4e75bbb7c8cf
shell-count-correctness is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository yonatangross/orchestkit (298 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,424 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).