Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ysfAskri/archguardianWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ysfaskri/archguardian/check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ysfaskri/archguardian/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ysfaskri/archguardian/check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ysfaskri/archguardian/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ysfaskri/archguardian/check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00137 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00055 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Check staged changes with archguardian
When the user asks to check staged changes or prepare for a commit:
- Verify staged changes exist with
git diff --cached --stat - Run
npx archguardian check --format json - Present findings focused on the staged files
- For each finding: show file, line, rule, explain the issue, offer to fix
- If all checks pass, confirm the user is clear to commit
- For intentional exceptions, suggest
// archguard-ignore-line <rule>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e604e467e640
check is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ysfAskri/archguardian (4 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 137 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
dos-verify-done-claims-cursorrules-prompt-file
Gate AI done/shipped/fixed claims on ground truth from the DOS kernel (dos verify, dos commit-audit) — git ancestry and the commit's own diff, never the agent's own narration.
hefesto-dogfood
Dogfood HefestoAI on every code or config change.
pull-request-templates
Pull request templates, commit conventions, code review standards, and quality gates. Applied when creating PRs, writing commits, or reviewing code.
git-workflow
Git workflow: commits, branches, PRs, history management.
safeword-pr-readiness
Prepare a pull request for human review and decide whether it may leave Draft. Use when creating or rewriting a PR description, marking a PR ready, responding to review, or checking mergeability.
review-workflow
Review, security, and commit workflow.