Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/ysfaskri/archguardian/scangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ysfAskri/archguardianWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00143 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Scan project with archguardian
When the user asks to scan or analyze the project:
- Run
npx archguardian scan --format json - Parse findings grouped by severity (errors > warnings > info)
- For each finding explain what the rule checks, show the code, suggest a fix
- If many findings exist, summarize top issues first
- Offer to auto-fix (
npx archguardian fix) or suppress false positives - If first-time adoption with many findings, suggest
npx archguardian scan --update-baseline
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 17 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e1fabb83c225
scan is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ysfAskri/archguardian (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 143 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
docs-governance
../../.agents/rules/docs-governance.md.
api-design
API design guidelines — REST principles, GraphQL patterns, versioning, pagination, error handling, documentation, security, caching, and testing. Applied when designing or reviewing API endpoints.
react-composition-patterns
React composition patterns for scalable component architecture including compound components, context providers, state management, boolean prop alternatives, render props vs children, and React 19 API changes. Use when refactoring components with many boolean props, building component libraries, designing flexible…
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
typescript
Changes to these high-fan-out internals can affect every message, delta, element, or rerun. Keep work in them minimal, and benchmark changes with representative stress-test apps.