Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhagqn/agentworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/zhagqn/agentwork/android)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/zhagqn/agentwork/android"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/zhagqn/agentwork/android/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/zhagqn/agentwork/android"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/zhagqn/agentwork/android.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00086 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00034 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
android scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
description: android tool rule for Cursor globs: [] alwaysApply: false
android-tool
当任务需要 Android 设备/模拟器验证时：
- 先读取
.shared/commands/android.md - 若环境未准备好，先
/android init - 失败时优先保留日志/截图/UI dump 等证据
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 1f26615d3527
android is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository zhagqn/agentwork (96 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
nativescript
NativeScript best practices and patterns for mobile applications.
cursorrules
Kortix is a React Native + Expo app built with TypeScript, NativeWind (Tailwind CSS), and a custom design system.
gradle
Enforce modern Gradle build practices for Java and Android projects, focusing on Kotlin DSL, modularity, version catalogs, and performance optimizations.
android-viewmodel
Android ViewModel conventions — StateFlow, repository abstraction, coroutines, no LiveData.
project-structure
Cursor rule "project-structure" from HeeGyeong/ComposeSample, covering project structure guide, layer structure, modularization rules, dependency rules and resource management.
ios-ui-development-focus
UI/UX and SwiftUI best practices - HIG compliance, presentation APIs, layout patterns.