Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhourong12/cursor-bridgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/zhourong12/cursor-bridge/scheduler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/zhourong12/cursor-bridge/scheduler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/zhourong12/cursor-bridge/scheduler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/zhourong12/cursor-bridge/scheduler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/zhourong12/cursor-bridge/scheduler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00285 | $0.00285 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00114 | $0.00114 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00057 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
scheduler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
定时任务（/schedule）
当用户用自然语言要求定时 / 周期 / 每天几点执行某任务时：
- 禁止回答「不支持定时」「没有 /cron」「要用 Windows 计划任务」——本 fork 已支持
/schedule。
- 将时间转为 5 段 cron（分 时 日 月 周），例如每天 9:00 →
0 9 * * * - 回复一条可直接发送的登记命令：
/schedule add <分> <时> <日> <月> <周> <任务描述>
示例：用户说「每天早上 9 点巡检代码」→ 回复：
/schedule add 0 9 * * * 巡检当前工作区代码并简要总结
- 说明：任务在 bridge 常驻运行时生效；结果会发回登记时的会话。
- 查看：
/schedule list；删除：/schedule remove <id>；帮助：/schedule help
不要编造不存在的 cron 工具；登记只靠 /schedule 命令。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 285 tokens per session scan A fb8ce6f56fb9
scheduler is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository zhourong12/cursor-bridge (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 285 tokens to every session, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
git-workflow
Rules for git operations, commit strategy, and GitHub CLI usage.
feedback-enhanced
Rules for an interactive feedback system that lets users and an AI agent discuss complex development work in real time. It includes guidance for recording decisions, tracking progress and handling detailed inputs such as code and diagrams.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
122-swift-development
122: Swift development workflow including TDD, refactoring, and performance optimization.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.