Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zql0805/memforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/zql0805/memforge/memforge-project-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/zql0805/memforge/memforge-project-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/zql0805/memforge/memforge-project-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/zql0805/memforge/memforge-project-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/zql0805/memforge/memforge-project-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00320 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00128 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
memforge-project-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
项目文档管理规则
docs/ 目录
项目根目录下的 docs/ 目录为项目文档的唯一存放位置。
Memforge 的文档索引工具（index_documents / sync_documents / watch_docs）默认扫描此目录。
查找文档
- 需要查阅项目文档时，在
docs/目录及其子目录中查找。
新增文档
- 需要新建文档时，放入
docs/对应子目录：docs/arch/— 架构与设计文档docs/api/— 接口文档docs/analysis/— 分析报告docs/code-review/— Code Review 记录docs/feature/— 功能需求与重构指南
- 如果对应子目录不存在，按需创建。
禁止使用 .cursor/prDocs/
- 不再在
.cursor/prDocs/目录下创建或存放文档。 - 如果发现项目中仍有
.cursor/prDocs/目录，应将其内容迁移到docs/对应子目录后删除。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 320 tokens per session scan A 87d97a47fed3
memforge-project-docs is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository zql0805/memforge (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 320 tokens to every session, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
04-spatial-parser
Guidelines for Spatial RAG and Markdown parsing.
read-xlsx
Reading, writing, diffing, and repairing spreadsheets (.xlsx) for AI agents via the xfa MCP server.
roslyn-mcp-overview
RoslynMcpServer — architecture, layout, version, DI.
roslyn-mcp-pitfalls
Known pitfalls and regression lessons from production use.
roslyn-mcp-docs-agents
Docs sync AGENTS/README, agent conventions, PowerShell, secrets.
roslyn-mcp-version-bump
Auto-bump Version after successful MCP self-build and reload.