Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills --skill product-ux-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/05-deepak-patidar/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills/product-ux-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills/product-ux-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills/product-ux-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills/product-ux-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills/product-ux-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.01166 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
product-ux-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product & UX Quality
Users never see your architecture; they see whether the button did something. "High quality product" is decided in the last 20% — the states, edges, and moments most developers (and most AI models) skip because the happy path already demos well. This skill is that 20%, as a checklist you don't get to skip.
The Five States rule — every screen, no exceptions
Any view that shows data has five states, and shipping fewer is shipping a bug:
- Loading — skeleton matching the final layout (not a lone spinner, never a blank flash).
- Empty — a designed moment, not "No data": say what this screen will show and give the action that creates the first item ("No invoices yet → Create your first invoice"). Empty states are the new user's entire first impression of your product.
- Error — human words + a retry action. Never a raw error code, never a dead end.
- Partial/short data — 1 item, 3 items: does the layout still look intentional?
- Overflow — 10,000 items, a 60-character name, a ₹9,99,99,999 amount: pagination, truncation with tooltip, layout survives.
Build all five while building the screen — a shared query-state component makes state 1–3 free forever; retrofitting is 5× the cost.
Forms — where products win or lose users
- Validate inline, on blur, with the message next to the field — not an alert after submit, and never only server-side (but always also server-side; client validation is UX, not truth).
- Error messages say how to fix: "Mobile number must be 10 digits" not "Invalid input".
- Submit buttons: disabled while submitting with a working indicator (prevents the double-submit that idempotency guards against — fix it at both layers), and the label says what happens ("Create Invoice", not "Submit", not "OK").
- Never lose user input: failed submits keep the form filled; destructive navigation away from a dirty form asks; long forms save drafts if abandonment costs real work.
- Smart defaults everywhere: today's date pre-filled, last-used values remembered, focus in the first field, Enter submits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 8ffcb06e7c29
product-ux-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository 05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,166 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend-design
Generates distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces and artifacts (React, Vue, HTML/CSS). Prioritizes bold aesthetics, unique typography, and motion to avoid generic designs. Use when building websites, landing pages, dashboards, posters, or when the user requests to style, beautify, or create visually…
ui-web
Web UI - glassmorphism, Tailwind, dark mode, accessibility.
frontend-ui-ux-system
A company-level guide for designing web interfaces and user experiences. It covers visual styles, design tokens (named values for colors, spacing, and typography), layout, interaction, accessibility, motion, and review checks.
accessibility
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is design), NOT test-runner setup (that is testing-web), NOT LCP/page-speed (that is…
ijfw-ui-spec
Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.
ring:validating-ux-completeness
Validating that UX specifications are complete before technical design: a read-only checklist over wireframes, states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and component-library alignment, emitting a DESIGN VALIDATED / NEEDS REVISION verdict to design-validation.md. Standalone utility — run after a product-designer…